Nadbytečný člen konference [Re: Mail delivery failed: ...]


To czdebian-l zavinac debian bod cz
From Matej Cepl <cepl zavinac surfbest bod net>
Date Thu, 3 Jul 2003 09:09:19 -0400
Mail-followup-to czdebian-l zavinac debian bod cz
Organization Law, Policy, & Society -- Northeastern University
User-agent Mutt/1.3.28i

Někdo to tady už zmiňoval, ale mohl bych poprosit správce této konference o odstřelení adresy stacomp-debian zavinac savcomp bod sk?

  Děkuji,

     Matěj

On Thu, Jul 03, 2003 at 04:31:40AM +0200, Mail Delivery System wrote:
This message was created automatically by mail delivery software.

A message that you sent could not be delivered to all of its recipients. The 
following address(es) failed:

        stavcomp-debian zavinac stavcomp bod sk

The reason for failure was as follows:

        Recipient not known

------ This is a copy of the message, including all the headers. ------

Return-path: <czdebian-l-bounces zavinac debian bod cz>
Received: from mta-in1.stonline.sk (mta-out1.stonline.sk [192.168.3.23])
by ims-1.stonline.sk (STOnline ESMTP Server)
with ESMTP id <0HHF00HQ5FUSOD zavinac ims-1 bod stonline bod sk> for stavcomw 
zavinac ims-ms-daemon
(ORCPT surgent bod m zavinac stonline bod sk); Thu, 03 Jul 2003 04:20:52 +0200 
(MEST)
Received: from ns1.euronet.sk (ns1.euronet.sk [81.0.192.41])
by mta-in1.stonline.sk (STOnline ESMTP Server)
with SMTP id <0HHF008JCFUSMN zavinac mta-in1 bod stonline bod sk> for surgent 
bod m zavinac stonline bod sk
(ORCPT surgent bod m zavinac stonline bod sk); Thu, 03 Jul 2003 04:20:52 +0200 
(MEST)
Received: (qmail 13950 invoked by uid 85); Thu, 03 Jul 2003 02:20:52 +0000
Received: (qmail 13939 invoked by uid 85); Thu, 03 Jul 2003 02:20:51 +0000
Received: from www.debian.cz (195.113.161.73)  by ns1.euronet.sk with SMTP;
Thu, 03 Jul 2003 02:20:51 +0000
Received: from www.debian.cz (localhost [127.0.0.1])    by www.debian.cz 
(Postfix)
with ESMTP      id C9945BF0A; Thu, 03 Jul 2003 04:20:48 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from server10.safepages.com (server10.safepages.com   
[216.127.146.24])
        by www.debian.cz (Postfix) with ESMTP id E4723BF02      for <czdebian-l 
zavinac debian bod cz>;
Thu, 03 Jul 2003 04:20:05 +0200 (CEST)
Received: by server10.safepages.com (Postfix, from userid 1012)
        id 38E38CC649; Thu, 03 Jul 2003 02:17:55 +0000 (GMT)
Received: from komensky.surfbest.net
(1Cust219.tnt7.bos10.da.uu.net  [65.227.254.219])       by 
server10.safepages.com
(Postfix) with ESMTP id 5B777CC00D      for <czdebian-l zavinac debian bod cz>; 
Thu,
03 Jul 2003 02:17:54 +0000 (GMT)
Received: from matej by komensky.surfbest.net with local
(Exim 3.35 #1   (Debian))       id 19XtSv-0000PC-00     for <czdebian-l zavinac 
debian bod cz>; Wed,
02 Jul 2003 22:04:53 -0400
Date: Wed, 02 Jul 2003 22:04:53 -0400
From: Matej Cepl <cepl zavinac surfbest bod net>
Subject: Re: dpkg dselect apt-get apt-DACO
In-reply-to: <bdvef9$2mka$1 zavinac ns bod felk bod cvut bod cz>
Sender: czdebian-l-bounces zavinac debian bod cz
To: czdebian-l zavinac debian bod cz
Errors-to: czdebian-l-bounces zavinac debian bod cz
Mail-followup-to: czdebian-l zavinac debian bod cz
Message-id: <20030703020452 bod GA1484 zavinac ceplovi bod cz>
Organization: Law, Policy, & Society -- Northeastern University
MIME-version: 1.0
Content-type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-2; format=flowed
Content-transfer-encoding: quoted-printable
Content-disposition: inline
Precedence: list
X-BeenThere: czdebian-l zavinac debian bod cz
Delivered-to: stavcomp-debian zavinac stavcomp bod sk
Delivered-to: czdebian-l zavinac debian bod cz
User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.28i
X-Operating-System: Linux 2.4.20
X-Virus-Scanned: by AMaViS perl-11
References: <007001c33f48$67ed3560$2c05000a zavinac nosfername>
<20030702171531 bod GA31205 zavinac ceplovi bod cz> <bdvef9$2mka$1 zavinac ns bod 
felk bod cvut bod cz>
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1
List-Post: <mailto:czdebian-l zavinac debian bod cz>
List-Subscribe: <http://www.debian.cz/mailman/listinfo/czdebian-l>,
        <mailto:czdebian-l-request zavinac debian bod cz?subject=subscribe>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://www.debian.cz/mailman/listinfo/czdebian-l>,
        <mailto:czdebian-l-request zavinac debian bod cz?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: </archiv>
List-Help: <mailto:czdebian-l-request zavinac debian bod cz?subject=help>
List-Id: Debian CZ/SK project discussion list <czdebian-l.debian.cz>

On Wed, Jul 02, 2003 at 10:14:33PM +0200, Martin Kebert,,, wrote:
Rozhodl jsem se odinstalovat par balicku. Na techto baliccich =20
ale zavisi jine balicky. Ktere, to se v aptitude bez rucniho=20
prohledavani ktery jednotlivy balicek je vyzadovan jinym zrejme=20
nedozvim.

V =BE=E1dn=E9m p=F8=EDpad=EC se nehodl=E1m pou=B9t=ECt do religious war -- =
pokud=20
V=E1m dselect vyhovuje, tak si ho u=BEijte. Co se t=FD=E8e konkr=E9tn=EC=20
tohoto probl=E9mu, existuje velice hezk=FD bal=ED=E8ek deborphan, kter=FD=
=20
um=ED vyhled=E1vat bal=ED=E8ky, kter=E9 se zdaj=ED b=FDt voln=E9.

Nekterymi ztracovany dselect mi okamzite pri pokusu od odebrani=20
takoveho balicku ukaze "podseznam" ktere balicky zavisi na tom,=20
ktery jsem se rozhodl odebrat. Umoznuje neco takoveho aptitude?

Kdy=BE m=E1te kursor na bal=ED=E8ku, tak "d" zobraz=ED seznam bal=ED=E8k=F9=
, na=20
kter=FDch z=E1vis=ED vybran=FD bal=ED=E8ek a "r" seznam bal=ED=E8k=F9, kter=
=E9 jsou=20
naopak na vybran=E9m bal=ED=E8ku z=E1visl=E9.

Ale jak jsem pravil, pokud V=E1m dselect vyhovuje tak si ho nechte.

Mat=ECj

--=20
Matej Cepl, http://www.ceplovi.cz/matej
GPG Finger: 89EF 4BC6 288A BF43 1BAB  25C3 E09F EF25 D964 84AC
138 Highland Ave. #10, Somerville, Ma 02143, (617) 623-1488
=20
If Patrick Henry thought that taxation without representation was
bad, he should see how bad it is with representation.

________________________________________________
CZdebian-l maillist  -  CZdebian-l zavinac debian bod cz
http://www.debian.cz/mailman/listinfo/czdebian-l
E-mail (un)subscriptions: czdebian-l-request zavinac debian bod cz


--
Matej Cepl, http://www.ceplovi.cz/matej
GPG Finger: 89EF 4BC6 288A BF43 1BAB  25C3 E09F EF25 D964 84AC
138 Highland Ave. #10, Somerville, Ma 02143, (617) 623-1488

MSDOS didn't get as bad as it is overnight -- it took over ten years
of careful development.
        -- dmeggins zavinac aix1 bod uottawa bod ca


Partial thread listing: