[ibm-pc] Re: "INT64 Confirmed"
To |
ibm-pc zavinac debian bod cz |
From |
"FEEB" <feeb zavinac chem bod utoronto bod ca> |
Date |
Mon, 28 Jun 2004 09:18:14 -0400 (EDT) |
Distribution |
world |
Newsgroups |
cz.comp.ibmpc, cz.talk, soc.culture.czecho-slovak |
Organization |
FEEB Systems Security |
On 25 Jun 2004 14:58:29 -0700, kujebak wrote:
>http://www.overclockers.com/articles913/index.asp
We did some benchmarking of our specific code on various HW. The
differences are quite staggering. Code A would run the fastest on
processor X, while slowest on processor Z. Code C would be the exact
opposite. Considering execution times, the code that would be run, price
and previous experience we ended up ordering a 128 CPU Opteron cluster as
an addition to our Athlon, Alpha and XEON cluster farm.
Actually I have a dual Opteron 1U machine with serial ATA RAID on my desk
right now. Running FC2 64 bit kernel it outperforms Athlon 2800+ running
some floating point code. And its the cheapest Opteron at 1394.404 MHz.
If you are seriously interested in this area, take a look at the InfoWorld
February 2, 2004 article about 2.6 Linux kernel. There are lot of things
besides just the HW.
Frank Bures, <feeb zavinac chem bod utoronto bod ca>
Partial thread listing: